loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hooper; David Sheldon.The latest application filed is for "image contrast enhancement".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Image contrast enhancement Grant 8,928,947 - Hooper January 6, 2 | 2015-01-06 |
Image Contrast Enhancement App 20130022287 - Hooper; David Sheldon | 2013-01-24 |
Image contrast enhancement Grant 8,228,560 - Hooper July 24, 2 | 2012-07-24 |
Image contrast enhancement Grant 8,014,034 - Hooper September 6, 2 | 2011-09-06 |
Method and system for visualization and operation of multiple content filters Grant 7,856,604 - Hooper , et al. December 21, 2 | 2010-12-21 |
Method And System For Visualization And Operation Of Multiple Content Filters App 20080189643 - Hooper; David Sheldon ;   et al. | 2008-08-07 |
Method and system for visualization and operation of multiple content filters Grant 7,356,778 - Hooper , et al. April 8, 2 | 2008-04-08 |
Image contrast enhancement App 20070036456 - Hooper; David Sheldon | 2007-02-15 |
Image contrast enhancement App 20060232823 - Hooper; David Sheldon | 2006-10-19 |
Method and system for visualization and operation of multiple content filters App 20050044100 - Hooper, David Sheldon ;   et al. | 2005-02-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.