Holdsworth; Simon Antony James

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Holdsworth; Simon Antony James.The latest application filed is for "port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediaries".

Company Profile

0.12.7

Holdsworth; Simon Antony James - Andover GB

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Messaging system interface to web services Grant 7,996,562 - Holdsworth August 9, 2	2011-08-09
Access to web services Grant 7,689,430 - Fremantle , et al. March 30, 2	2010-03-30
Port Type Agnostic Proxy Support For Web Services Intermediaries App 20090024701 - Flurry; Gregory A. ; et al.	2009-01-22
Port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediates Grant 7,464,142 - Flurry , et al. December 9, 2	2008-12-09
Enhanced port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediaries Grant 7,296,072 - Flurry , et al. November 13, 2	2007-11-13
Apparatus and method for selecting a web service in response to a request from a client device Grant 7,188,155 - Flurry , et al. March 6, 2	2007-03-06
Publish/subscribe data processing with publication points for customized message processing Grant 7,103,680 - Holdsworth , et al. September 5, 2	2006-09-05
A Method, System and Computer Program for Addressing a Web Service App 20060136600 - Holdsworth; Simon Antony James	2006-06-22
Enhanced port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediaries App 20050144277 - Flurry, Gregory Alan ; et al.	2005-06-30
Port type agnostic proxy support for web services intermediaries App 20050132086 - Flurry, Gregory Alan ; et al.	2005-06-16
Apparatus and method for selecting a web service in response to a request from a client device App 20040139151 - Flurry, Gregory Alan ; et al.	2004-07-15
Access to web services App 20040117199 - Fremantle, Paul Zachary ; et al.	2004-06-17
Dynamic web service implementation discovery and selection apparatus and method App 20040111525 - Berkland, Philip Theodore ; et al.	2004-06-10
System and method for creating an object oriented transaction service that interoperates with procedural transaction coordinators Grant 6,317,773 - Cobb , et al. November 13, 2	2001-11-13
System for building optimal commit trees in a distributed transaction processing system Grant 6,205,464 - Cobb , et al. March 20, 2	2001-03-20
Apparatus, method and computer program for providing arbitrary locking requesters for controlling concurrent access to server resources Grant 6,052,731 - Holdsworth , et al. April 18, 2	2000-04-18
Apparatus, method and computer program product for client/server computing with a transaction representation located on each transactionally involved server Grant 6,038,589 - Holdsworth , et al. March 14, 2	2000-03-14
Apparatus and method for dispatching client method calls within a server computer system Grant 5,925,098 - Freund , et al. July 20, 1	1999-07-20
System, method, and article of manufacture for adding transactional recovery to a binary class in an object oriented system Grant 5,878,428 - Copeland , et al. March 2, 1	1999-03-02

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.