Hoff; Seymour
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hoff; Seymour.The latest application filed is for "cartridge for liquid infusion apparatus".
- Hoff; Seymour - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Cartridge for liquid infusion apparatus Grant 4,140,117 - Buckles , et al. February 20, 1 | 1979-02-20 |
| Intrauterine device with seeker for finding the cervical os and housing member for fitting device in an inserter Grant 3,993,058 - Hoff November 23, 1 | 1976-11-23 |
| Intrauterine device with restrictor for maintaining device in uterine cavity Grant 3,935,860 - Hoff February 3, 1 | 1976-02-03 |
| Inserter for intrauterine device Grant 3,927,666 - Hoff December 23, 1 | 1975-12-23 |
| Apparatus for inserting an intrauterine device Grant 3,918,444 - Hoff , et al. November 11, 1 | 1975-11-11 |
| Intrauterine device with locator means for indicating uterine position of device Grant 3,902,483 - Place , et al. September 2, 1 | 1975-09-02 |
| Liquid infusion unit Grant 3,895,631 - Buckles , et al. July 22, 1 | 1975-07-22 |
| Inserter for contraceptive device Grant 3,880,156 - Hoff April 29, 1 | 1975-04-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 