Ho; Ngo Thanh
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ho; Ngo Thanh.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for data privacy in passive optical networks".
- Ho; Ngo Thanh - Arlington TX
- Ho; Ngo Thanh - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for data privacy in passive optical networks Grant 8,335,316 - Hirth , et al. December 18, 2 | 2012-12-18 |
| Method And Apparatus For Data Privacy In Passive Optical Networks App 20090262937 - Hirth; Ryan E. ; et al. | 2009-10-22 |
| Intelligent packet transmission engine Grant 6,760,781 - Wang , et al. July 6, 2 | 2004-07-06 |
| Peripheral device power management circuit and method for selecting between main and auxiliary power sources or from third power source Grant 6,564,333 - Ho , et al. May 13, 2 | 2003-05-13 |
| Sensing auxiliary power in various peripheral component interconnect environments Grant 6,438,429 - Ho , et al. August 20, 2 | 2002-08-20 |
| FIFO-based network interface supporting out-of-order processing Grant 6,327,625 - Wang , et al. December 4, 2 | 2001-12-04 |
| Asynchronous transmit packet buffer Grant 6,128,715 - Wang , et al. October 3, 2 | 2000-10-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 