loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hively; James W..The latest application filed is for "method of fabricating a microelectronic package having polymer esd protection".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method of fabricating a microelectronic package having polymer ESD protection Grant 5,970,321 - Hively October 19, 1 | 1999-10-19 |
Microelectronic package with polymer ESD protection Grant 5,955,762 - Hively September 21, 1 | 1999-09-21 |
Microelectronic device with thin film electrostatic discharge protection structure Grant 5,869,869 - Hively February 9, 1 | 1999-02-09 |
Test socket for testing integrated circuit packages Grant 5,808,474 - Hively , et al. September 15, 1 | 1998-09-15 |
Very high density wafer scale device architecture Grant 5,691,949 - Hively , et al. November 25, 1 | 1997-11-25 |
Very high density wafer scale device architecture Grant 5,252,507 - Hively , et al. October 12, 1 | 1993-10-12 |
Package for an integrated circuit structure Grant 5,223,741 - Bechtel , et al. June 29, 1 | 1993-06-29 |
High density multichip package with interconnect structure and heatsink Grant 5,182,632 - Bechtel , et al. January 26, 1 | 1993-01-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.