loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hirshfield; Edward.The latest application filed is for "satellite communication service with non-congruent sub-beam coverage".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Satellite communication service with non-congruent sub-beam coverage Grant 6,301,476 - Monte , et al. October 9, 2 | 2001-10-09 |
Satellite communication service with non-congruent sub-beam coverage Grant 6,101,385 - Monte , et al. August 8, 2 | 2000-08-08 |
Mobile communication satellite payload Grant 5,623,269 - Hirshfield , et al. April 22, 1 | 1997-04-22 |
Method and apparatus for increasing antenna efficiency for hand-held mobile satellite communications terminal Grant 5,581,268 - Hirshfield December 3, 1 | 1996-12-03 |
Mobile communication satellite payload Grant 5,548,292 - Hirshfield , et al. August 20, 1 | 1996-08-20 |
Active transmit phased array antenna with amplitude taper Grant 5,504,493 - Hirshfield April 2, 1 | 1996-04-02 |
Mobile communication satellite payload Grant 5,422,647 - Hirshfield , et al. June 6, 1 | 1995-06-06 |
Active transmit phased array antenna Grant 5,283,587 - Hirshfield , et al. February 1, 1 | 1994-02-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.