Hirota; Keiichi
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hirota; Keiichi.The latest application filed is for "laser processing apparatus, laser processing method and distance measurement method".
- Hirota; Keiichi - Kanagawa-ken JP
- HIROTA; Keiichi - Yokohama JP
- Hirota; Keiichi - Yokohama-shi JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Laser irradiation device and method of diagnosing the health of a laser irradiation head Grant 9,662,744 - Chida , et al. May 30, 2 | 2017-05-30 |
| Laser Processing Apparatus, Laser Processing Method And Distance Measurement Method App 20170087667 - YAMAMOTO; Setsu ; et al. | 2017-03-30 |
| Laser irradiation apparatus and laser irradiation method Grant 9,186,751 - Chida , et al. November 17, 2 | 2015-11-17 |
| Laser Irradiation Device And Method Of Diagnosing The Health Of A Laser Irradiation Head App 20140224780 - CHIDA; Itaru ; et al. | 2014-08-14 |
| Laser Irradiation Apparatus And Laser Irradiation Method App 20120325790 - CHIDA; Itaru ; et al. | 2012-12-27 |
| Time-interleaved AD converter Grant 7,352,316 - Hori , et al. April 1, 2 | 2008-04-01 |
| Time-interleaved AD converter App 20070120724 - Hori; Kazuyuki ; et al. | 2007-05-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 