Hillier; Stephen
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hillier; Stephen.The latest application filed is for "rfid transponder information security methods systems and devices".
- Hillier; Stephen - Edinburgh GB
- Hillier; Stephen - Ottawa CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Gonadotrophins in the treatment anovulatory women Grant 7,695,721 - Franks , et al. April 13, 2 | 2010-04-13 |
| RFID transponder information security methods systems and devices Grant 7,548,152 - Hillier June 16, 2 | 2009-06-16 |
| Computer network security system and method having unilateral enforceable security policy provision Grant 7,174,563 - Brownlie , et al. February 6, 2 | 2007-02-06 |
| Luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone for use in inducing folliculogenesis Grant 7,151,083 - Franks , et al. December 19, 2 | 2006-12-19 |
| RFID transponder information security methods systems and devices App 20060077034 - Hillier; Stephen | 2006-04-13 |
| Gonadotrophins App 20040224895 - Franks, Stephen ; et al. | 2004-11-11 |
| Computer network security system and method having unilateral enforceable security policy provision Grant 6,202,157 - Brownlie , et al. March 13, 2 | 2001-03-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 