loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hicks; James E..The latest application filed is for "aggregating data to identify diversion events".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Aggregating data to identify diversion events Grant 11,309,069 - Murray , et al. April 19, 2 | 2022-04-19 |
Aggregating Data To Identify Diversion Events App 20200075150 - Murray; Scott ;   et al. | 2020-03-05 |
Smart remote control Grant 8,068,184 - Hicks November 29, 2 | 2011-11-29 |
Smart Remote Control App 20100309389 - Hicks; James E. | 2010-12-09 |
Smart remote control Grant 7,782,407 - Hicks August 24, 2 | 2010-08-24 |
Automatic convergence for image projection systems Grant 7,733,429 - Maxson , et al. June 8, 2 | 2010-06-08 |
Clock Face Recording Status Indicator App 20080101164 - Hicks; James E. | 2008-05-01 |
Screen frame and bezel clip system Grant 7,315,417 - Chen , et al. January 1, 2 | 2008-01-01 |
Smart remote control App 20070195195 - Hicks; James E. | 2007-08-23 |
Automatic image convergence for projection television systems Grant 7,196,741 - Hicks March 27, 2 | 2007-03-27 |
Screen frame and bezel clip system App 20060221265 - Chen; Luan Chi ;   et al. | 2006-10-05 |
Automatic convergence for image projection systems App 20050219426 - Maxson, Brian ;   et al. | 2005-10-06 |
Automatic convergence for image projection systems App 20050219425 - Maxson, Brian ;   et al. | 2005-10-06 |
Automatic image convergence for projection television systems App 20050179825 - Hicks, James E. | 2005-08-18 |
Method and system for overloaded array processing Grant 6,868,133 - Hicks , et al. March 15, 2 | 2005-03-15 |
Method and system for overloaded array processing App 20010048725 - Hicks, James E. ;   et al. | 2001-12-06 |
Apparatus for sampling instruction execution information in a processor pipeline Grant 6,195,748 - Chrysos , et al. February 27, 2 | 2001-02-27 |
Method and apparatus for sampling multiple potentially concurrent instructions in a processor pipeline Grant 6,163,840 - Chrysos , et al. December 19, 2 | 2000-12-19 |
Method for estimating statistics of properties of interactions processed by a processor pipeline Grant 6,119,075 - Dean , et al. September 12, 2 | 2000-09-12 |
Method for estimating execution rates of program execution paths Grant 6,070,009 - Dean , et al. May 30, 2 | 2000-05-30 |
Apparatus for randomly sampling instructions in a processor pipeline Grant 6,000,044 - Chrysos , et al. December 7, 1 | 1999-12-07 |
Apparatus for sampling instruction operand or result values in a processor pipeline Grant 5,923,872 - Chrysos , et al. July 13, 1 | 1999-07-13 |
Method for estimating statistics of properties of instructions processed by a processor pipeline Grant 5,809,450 - Chrysos , et al. September 15, 1 | 1998-09-15 |
Commutated SCR regulator for a horizontal deflection circuit Grant 4,321,514 - Thibodeau , et al. March 23, 1 | 1982-03-23 |
Switching regulator for television deflection circuit with improved ultor voltage regulation Grant 4,190,791 - Hicks February 26, 1 | 1980-02-26 |
High efficiency d.c. voltage regulator Grant 4,068,158 - Hicks , et al. January 10, 1 | 1978-01-10 |
Momentary power supply shutdown system Grant 3,916,288 - Hicks , et al. October 28, 1 | 1975-10-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.