Hibner; David H.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hibner; David H..The latest application filed is for "moment imparting bearings for controlling shaft deflection".
- Hibner; David H. - Ashford CT
- Hibner; David H. - Colchester CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Moment imparting bearings for controlling shaft deflection Grant 5,455,472 - Weiss , et al. October 3, 1 | 1995-10-03 |
| Apparatus for supporting a rotating shaft in a rotary machine Grant 5,110,257 - Hibner , et al. May 5, 1 | 1992-05-05 |
| Apparatus and method for supporting a rotating shaft in a rotary machine Grant 4,947,639 - Hibner , et al. August 14, 1 | 1990-08-14 |
| Variable stiffness oil film damper Grant 4,867,655 - Barbic , et al. September 19, 1 | 1989-09-19 |
| Nutation damper Grant 4,657,410 - Hibner April 14, 1 | 1987-04-14 |
| Viscous/friction damper Grant 4,353,604 - Dulberger , et al. October 12, 1 | 1982-10-12 |
| Viscous damper Grant 4,337,983 - Hibner July 6, 1 | 1982-07-06 |
| Damped intershaft bearing and stabilizer Grant 4,046,430 - Buono , et al. September 6, 1 | 1977-09-06 |
| Shaft Damping Arrangement Grant 3,756,672 - Hibner , et al. September 4, 1 | 1973-09-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 