Hetz; Walter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hetz; Walter.The latest application filed is for "intracavitary ultrasound scanner means".
- Hetz; Walter - Erlangen DE
- Hetz; Walter - 8520 Erlangen DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Intracavitary ultrasound scanner means Grant 4,869,258 - Hetz September 26, 1 | 1989-09-26 |
| Ultrasonic probe which can be introduced into a body Grant 4,561,446 - Hetz December 31, 1 | 1985-12-31 |
| Manually operated ultrasound application Grant 4,545,386 - Hetz , et al. October 8, 1 | 1985-10-08 |
| Manually operated ultrasound applicator Grant 4,535,781 - Hetz August 20, 1 | 1985-08-20 |
| Ultrasound device for sector scanning Grant 4,530,362 - Hetz July 23, 1 | 1985-07-23 |
| Apparatus for ultrasonic scanning of objects Grant 4,291,578 - Hetz , et al. September 29, 1 | 1981-09-29 |
| Chair for dental patients Grant RE30,648 - Ohlrogge , et al. June 16, 1 | 1981-06-16 |
| Ultrasonic apparatus for medical diagnosis Grant 4,110,723 - Hetz , et al. August 29, 1 | 1978-08-29 |
| Chair For Dental Patients Grant 3,806,192 - Ohlrogge , et al. April 23, 1 | 1974-04-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 