Henneman; Kim Porter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Henneman; Kim Porter.The latest application filed is for "medical examination apparatus, system, and/or method".
- Henneman; Kim Porter - Bend OR
- Henneman; Kim Porter - Portland OR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Locking collar Grant D891,024 - Schenone , et al. | 2020-07-21 |
| Locking collar for a cart Grant D880,802 - Schenone , et al. | 2020-04-07 |
| Locking collar Grant D855,920 - Schenone , et al. | 2019-08-06 |
| Cart Grant D852,447 - Schenone , et al. | 2019-06-25 |
| Electronic auscultation device Grant 8,092,396 - Bagha , et al. January 10, 2 | 2012-01-10 |
| Medical device Grant D589,144 - Bagha , et al. March 24, 2 | 2009-03-24 |
| Top portion for a bib clip Grant D577,497 - Henneman , et al. September 30, 2 | 2008-09-30 |
| Bib clip Grant D542,544 - Henneman , et al. May 15, 2 | 2007-05-15 |
| Medical examination apparatus, system, and/or method App 20070106179 - Bagha; Merat ; et al. | 2007-05-10 |
| Securement devices for bibs and the like App 20050273981 - Henneman, Kim Porter ; et al. | 2005-12-15 |
| Flexibly Branched Led Light App 20050024863 - Phipps, Martin ; et al. | 2005-02-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 