loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hendricks; Matthew W..The latest application filed is for "rotorcraft vibration suppression system in a four corner pylon mount configuration".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Rotorcraft vibration suppression system in a four corner pylon mount configuration Grant 10,330,166 - Lee , et al. | 2019-06-25 |
Rotorcraft Vibration Suppression System In A Four Corner Pylon Mount Configuration App 20180038439 - Lee; Taeoh ;   et al. | 2018-02-08 |
Rotorcraft vibration suppression system in a four corner pylon mount configuration Grant 9,777,788 - Lee , et al. October 3, 2 | 2017-10-03 |
Helicopter transmission mount system Grant 9,365,294 - Griffin , et al. June 14, 2 | 2016-06-14 |
Helicopter transmission mount system Grant 9,254,914 - Hendricks , et al. February 9, 2 | 2016-02-09 |
Helicopter Transmission Mount System App 20150139800 - Hendricks; Matthew W. ;   et al. | 2015-05-21 |
Helicopter Transmission Mount System App 20150136900 - Griffin; Maurice D. ;   et al. | 2015-05-21 |
Rotorcraft Vibration Suppression System In A Four Corner Pylon Mount Configuration App 20130270415 - Lee; Taeoh ;   et al. | 2013-10-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.