Hein; Benjamin Reed
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hein; Benjamin Reed.The latest application filed is for "high-authority yaw control for a tandem vehicle with rigid rotors".
- Hein; Benjamin Reed - New Haven CT
- Hein; Benjamin Reed - Milford CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| High-authority yaw control for a tandem vehicle with rigid rotors Grant 10,564,648 - Hein Feb | 2020-02-18 |
| High-authority Yaw Control For A Tandem Vehicle With Rigid Rotors App 20170336809 - Hein; Benjamin Reed | 2017-11-23 |
| Flexbeam hinge for helicopter blade active trailing edge flap Grant 9,428,268 - Kopanski , et al. August 30, 2 | 2016-08-30 |
| Multi-element rotor blade Grant 9,211,950 - Hein December 15, 2 | 2015-12-15 |
| Flexbeam Hinge For Helicopter Blade Active Trailing Edge Flap App 20150010401 - Kopanski; Kris ; et al. | 2015-01-08 |
| Multi-element Rotor Blade App 20130294914 - Hein; Benjamin Reed | 2013-11-07 |
| Rotary wing aircraft Grant D665,720 - Stille , et al. August 21, 2 | 2012-08-21 |
| Rotary-wing aircraft with a common dynamic system/backbone structure Grant D614,559 - Alber , et al. April 27, 2 | 2010-04-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 