Trademark applications and grants for Heasley, John M.. Heasley, John M. has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LIQUIDAM"
Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
Address | 1614 Dover Street Iowa City, IOWA UNITED STATES 522402555 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Gingival retraction devices with a structural backing component to reliably insert retraction material into the gingival crevice 20040265777 - 10/603641 Heasley, John M. | 2004-12-30 |
Rubber dam clamps retained by adhesion and improved frictional forces 20030087216 - 10/267516 Heasley, John M. | 2003-05-08 |
Rubber dam clamps retained by adhesion and improved frictional forces 6,981,870 - 10/267,516 Heasley January 3, 2 | 2006-01-03 |
Absorbent polymer roll holder 5,800,173 - 08/514,108 Heasley September 1, 1 | 1998-09-01 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "LIQUIDAM" 76493331 |
LIQUIDAM 2003-02-21 |
![]() "SLIT-DAM" 76482278 |
SLIT-DAM 2003-01-13 |
![]() "PEDODAM" 76308611 |
PEDODAM 2001-09-06 |
![]() "A COSMETICARTS DAM" 76266087 |
A COSMETICARTS DAM 2001-06-04 |
![]() "P PROSTHODAM" 76266088 |
P PROSTHODAM 2001-06-04 |
![]() "QD QUADRA DAM" 76266089 |
QD QUADRA DAM 2001-06-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.