Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hayashibara; Ken.The latest application filed is for "device for eliminating electromagnetic waves".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Antiallergic agent Grant 7,230,079 - Okamoto , et al. June 12, 2 | 2007-06-12 |
Device for eliminating electromagnetic waves Grant 6,992,314 - Masaki , et al. January 31, 2 | 2006-01-31 |
Device for eliminating electromagnetic waves App 20040041106 - Masaki, Kazuya ;   et al. | 2004-03-04 |
Device for eliminating electromagnetic waves App 20030006384 - Masaki, Kazuya ;   et al. | 2003-01-09 |
FM theta-inducing audible sound, and method, device and recorded medium to generate the same Grant 5,954,630 - Masaki , et al. September 21, 1 | 1999-09-21 |
Filling composition for incandescent lamp, and incandescent lamp containing the same and its use Grant 5,432,408 - Matsuda , et al. July 11, 1 | 1995-07-11 |
Adjustable desk lamp Grant D352,125 - Hayashibara November 1, 1 | 1994-11-01 |
Luminaire using incandescent lamp as luminous source Grant 5,343,122 - Sugimori , et al. * August 30, 1 | 1994-08-30 |
Sealed variable resistor Grant 5,144,274 - Masaki September 1, 1 | 1992-09-01 |
Low-frequency electrotherapeutic device Grant 5,133,351 - Masaki July 28, 1 | 1992-07-28 |
Low-frequency treatment device directed to use in bath Grant 4,841,972 - Masaki June 27, 1 | 1989-06-27 |
Controller for electric devices directed to use in bath Grant 4,812,804 - Masaki March 14, 1 | 1989-03-14 |
Device for limiting inrush current Grant 4,800,329 - Masaki January 24, 1 | 1989-01-24 |
Switch for iontophoresing cation and anion Grant 4,792,702 - Masaki December 20, 1 | 1988-12-20 |
Therapeutic device for iontophoresing cation and anion Grant 4,786,278 - Masaki November 22, 1 | 1988-11-22 |
Apparatus for generating pulse line of magnetic force Grant 4,757,419 - Masaki July 12, 1 | 1988-07-12 |
Apparatus for limiting surge currents in dc-illuminated incandescent lamp Grant 4,736,138 - Masaki April 5, 1 | 1988-04-05 |
Surge current-limiting circuit Grant 4,716,511 - Masaki December 29, 1 | 1987-12-29 |
Resonant vibration-transmitting apparatus Grant 4,710,655 - Masaki December 1, 1 | 1987-12-01 |
Electromagnetic vibration generator Grant 4,697,581 - Endo , et al. October 6, 1 | 1987-10-06 |
Electrotherapeutic apparatus for iontophoresis Grant 4,689,039 - Masaki August 25, 1 | 1987-08-25 |
Frequency divider Grant 4,654,579 - Masaki March 31, 1 | 1987-03-31 |
Device for regulating ac current circuit Grant 4,572,992 - Masaki February 25, 1 | 1986-02-25 |
Device for eliminating inrush-current Grant 4,555,741 - Masaki November 26, 1 | 1985-11-26 |
Process for the production of human erythropoietin Grant 4,377,513 - Sugimoto , et al. March 22, 1 | 1983-03-22 |
Process for preparing mouse interferon Grant 4,328,207 - Sugimoto May 4, 1 | 1982-05-04 |
Type II interferon and agents thereof Grant 4,285,929 - Sugimoto , et al. * August 25, 1 | 1981-08-25 |
Interferon and preparations containing interferon Grant 4,276,282 - Sugimoto , et al. June 30, 1 | 1981-06-30 |
Containing lactitol as a sweetener Grant 3,973,050 - Hayashibara , et al. August 3, 1 | 1976-08-03 |
Shaped Body Of Gelatin Containing Amylose And/or Amylitol Grant 3,765,917 - Hijiya , et al. October 16, 1 | 1973-10-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.