loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hayashi; Steven J..The latest application filed is for "fault-tolerant multiprocessor system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Fault-tolerant multiprocessor system Grant 4,817,091 - Katzman , et al. March 28, 1 | 1989-03-28 |
Interprocessor communication Grant 4,807,116 - Katzman , et al. February 21, 1 | 1989-02-21 |
Data error detection and device controller failure detection in an input/output system Grant 4,672,537 - Katzman , et al. June 9, 1 | 1987-06-09 |
Multiprocessor system Grant 4,672,535 - Katzman , et al. June 9, 1 | 1987-06-09 |
Power interlock system and method for use with multiprocessor systems Grant 4,639,864 - Katzman , et al. January 27, 1 | 1987-01-27 |
Multiprocessor system Grant 4,484,275 - Katzman , et al. November 20, 1 | 1984-11-20 |
Buffer control for a data path system Grant 4,378,588 - Katzman , et al. March 29, 1 | 1983-03-29 |
Multiprocessor system Grant 4,365,295 - Katzman , et al. December 21, 1 | 1982-12-21 |
Multiprocessor system Grant 4,356,550 - Katzman , et al. October 26, 1 | 1982-10-26 |
Multiprocessor system Grant 4,228,496 - Katzman , et al. October 14, 1 | 1980-10-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.