loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hayakawa; Takahiko.The latest application filed is for "protein involved in restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility to fertility and gene encoding the protein and gene".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Protein involved in restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility to fertility and gene encoding the protein and gene Grant 8,134,045 - Imamura , et al. March 13, 2 | 2012-03-13 |
Protein Involved in Restoration of Cytoplasmic Male Sterility to Fertility and Gene Encoding the Protein and Gene App 20100199376 - Imamura; Jun ;   et al. | 2010-08-05 |
Protein involved in restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility to fertility and gene encoding the protein Grant 7,767,886 - Imamura , et al. August 3, 2 | 2010-08-03 |
Protein participating in restoration from cytoplasmic male sterility to fertility and gene encoding the same App 20040117868 - Imamura, Jun ;   et al. | 2004-06-17 |
Protein involved in restoration of cytoplasmic male sterility to fertility and gene encoding the protein and gene App 20040088749 - Imamura, Jun ;   et al. | 2004-05-06 |
Method for increasing storage lipid content in plant seed Grant 5,914,449 - Murase , et al. June 22, 1 | 1999-06-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.