loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hawkes; Daniel John.The latest application filed is for "continuous extrusion apparatus".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Continuous extrusion apparatus and method for the production of cable having a core sheathed with aluminum based sheath with a continuous extrusion apparatus Grant 8,281,634 - Hawkes October 9, 2 | 2012-10-09 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus Grant 8,061,173 - Hawkes November 22, 2 | 2011-11-22 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus App 20110162428 - Hawkes; Daniel John | 2011-07-07 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus and method for the production of cable having a core sheathed with aluminum based sheath with a continuous extrusion apparatus App 20100163270 - Hawkes; Daniel John | 2010-07-01 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus Grant 6,988,389 - Hawkes January 24, 2 | 2006-01-24 |
Copper tubing Grant 6,655,415 - Dawson , et al. December 2, 2 | 2003-12-02 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus Grant 6,619,093 - Dawson , et al. September 16, 2 | 2003-09-16 |
Continuous extrusion apparatus App 20020121121 - Dawson, John ;   et al. | 2002-09-05 |
Copper tubing App 20020121310 - Dawson, John ;   et al. | 2002-09-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.