Trademark applications and grants for Hauff Technik G M B H Co Kg. Hauff Technik G M B H Co Kg has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "HAUFF-TECHNIK"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
PRESS SEAL WITH AN ELASTOMER BODY AND A TENSIONING BOLT 20210071800 - 17/083737 Kurz; Ralf | 2021-03-11 |
TENSIONING RING WITH A TENSIONING SECTION 20210018133 - 16/955360 Heck; Martin ;   et al. | 2021-01-21 |
PRESS SEAL WITH AN ELASTOMER BODY AND A TENSIONING BOLT 20190301656 - 16/345309 Kurz; Ralf | 2019-10-03 |
PRESS SEAL WITH PRESSING BODY 20190195396 - 16/329536 Kurz; Ralf | 2019-06-27 |
PRESS SEAL SYSTEM FOR SEALING AGAINST A LINE 20180252338 - 15/907559 Kurz; Ralf | 2018-09-06 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "HAUFF-TECHNIK" 5253036 79181125 |
HAUFF-TECHNIK 2015-09-02 |
![]() "HSD" 5253037 79181126 |
HSD 2015-09-02 |
![]() "HRD" 5253039 79181303 |
HRD 2015-09-02 |
![]() "HRK" 5243299 79180843 |
HRK 2015-09-02 |
![]() "HAUFF" 79181060 |
HAUFF 2015-09-02 |
![]() "HSI" 5253055 79183865 |
HSI 2015-06-22 |
NCAGE Code | C1358 | HAUFF-TECHNIK GMBH & CO.KG |
CAGE Code | C1358 | HAUFF-TECHNIK GMBH & CO.KG |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.