HASLER; JAMES M
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for HASLER; JAMES M.The latest application filed is for "chimeric insecticidal proteins".
- HASLER; JAMES M - DANVILLE IN
- Hasler; James M. - Danville IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Chimeric Insecticidal Proteins App 20220162635 - ZACK; MARC D. ; et al. | 2022-05-26 |
| Chimeric insecticidal proteins Grant 11,274,315 - Zack , et al. March 15, 2 | 2022-03-15 |
| Chimeric Insecticidal Proteins App 20200318132 - ZACK; MARC D ; et al. | 2020-10-08 |
| Methods for purifying insect membrane-bound receptor proteins from recombinant production hosts Grant 9,163,225 - Hasler , et al. October 20, 2 | 2015-10-20 |
| Assays utilizing nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits Grant 9,005,981 - Orr , et al. April 14, 2 | 2015-04-14 |
| Methods For Purifying Insect Membrane-Bound Receptor Proteins From Recombinant Production Hosts App 20140187758 - HASLER; James M. ; et al. | 2014-07-03 |
| Novel Assays Utilizing Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Subunits App 20100212029 - Orr; Nailah ; et al. | 2010-08-19 |
| Antibody-mediated down-regulation of plant proteins Grant 6,767,742 - Sukhapinda , et al. July 27, 2 | 2004-07-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 