Hart; Stuart Richard

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hart; Stuart Richard.The latest application filed is for "laparoscopic tool with obturator".

Company Profile

4.24.20

Hart; Stuart Richard - Tampa FL

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Minimally invasive laparoscopic tissue removal device Grant 10,595,890 - Hart , et al.	2020-03-24
Image-based automated measurement model to predict pelvic organ prolapse Grant 10,593,035 - Onal , et al.	2020-03-17
Laparoscopic tool with obturator Grant 10,517,642 - Hart , et al. Dec	2019-12-31
Method of manufacturing a synthetic skin and tissue model Grant 10,150,265 - Hart , et al. Dec	2018-12-11
Synthetic vaginal cuff model and method of simulating vaginal cuff closure Grant 10,083,629 - Simoes , et al. September 25, 2	2018-09-25
Laparoscopic Tool With Obturator App 20180132893 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2018-05-17
Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Tissue Removal Device App 20180085139 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2018-03-29
Laparoscopic tool with obturator Grant 9,901,374 - Hart , et al. February 27, 2	2018-02-27
Minimally invasive laparoscopic tissue removal device Grant 9,861,380 - Hart , et al. January 9, 2	2018-01-09
Transvaginal specimen extraction device Grant 9,789,268 - Hart , et al. October 17, 2	2017-10-17
Small diameter laparoscopic tool having releasable tip Grant 9,629,650 - Hart , et al. April 25, 2	2017-04-25
Method of treating pelvic prolapse using a sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy vaginal positioning and mesh retention system Grant 9,579,180 - Hart , et al. February 28, 2	2017-02-28
Synthetic Vaginal Cuff Model And Method Of Simulating Vaginal Cuff Closure App 20170039892 - Simoes; Mario Alves ; et al.	2017-02-09
Synthetic skin and tissue model Grant 9,514,658 - Hart , et al. December 6, 2	2016-12-06
Method Of Treating Pelvic Prolapse Using A Sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy Vaginal Positioning And Mesh Retention System App 20160317271 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2016-11-03
Image-based Automated Measurement Model To Predict Pelvic Organ Prolapse App 20160275678 - Onal; Sinan ; et al.	2016-09-22
Sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy vaginal positioning and mesh retention system Grant 9,414,904 - Hart , et al. August 16, 2	2016-08-16
Small Diameter Laparoscopic Tool Having Releasable Tip App 20160022304 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2016-01-28
Sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy Vaginal Positioning And Mesh Retention System App 20150374474 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2015-12-31
Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Tissue Removal Device App 20150335342 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2015-11-26
Small diameter laparoscopic tool having releasable tip Grant 9,186,167 - Hart , et al. November 17, 2	2015-11-17
Laparoscopic Tool With Obturator App 20150282836 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2015-10-08
Transvaginal Specimen Extraction Device App 20140288486 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2014-09-25
Small Diameter Laparoscopic Tool Having Releasable Tip App 20140074135 - Hart; Stuart Richard ; et al.	2014-03-13

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.