Harrow; Jeffrey R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Harrow; Jeffrey R..The latest application filed is for "entity management system".
- Harrow; Jeffrey R. - Amherst NH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Entity management system Grant 6,438,591 - Fehskens , et al. August 20, 2 | 2002-08-20 |
| Method and device for monitoring, manipulating, and viewing system information Grant 5,682,489 - Harrow , et al. October 28, 1 | 1997-10-28 |
| Extensible entity management system including a dispatching kernel and modules which independently interpret and execute commands Grant 5,557,796 - Fehskens , et al. September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
| Extensible entity management system including rule-based alarms Grant 5,475,838 - Fehskens , et al. December 12, 1 | 1995-12-12 |
| System monitoring method and device including a graphical user interface to view and manipulate system information Grant 5,375,199 - Harrow , et al. December 20, 1 | 1994-12-20 |
| Extensible entity management system including a dispatching kernel and modules which independently interpret and execute commands Grant 5,345,587 - Fehskens , et al. September 6, 1 | 1994-09-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 