Harink; Thijs
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Harink; Thijs.The latest application filed is for "lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method utilizing movement of clean air to reduce contamination".
- Harink; Thijs - Eindhoven NL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method utilizing movement of clean air to reduce contamination Grant 7,522,258 - Luttikhuis , et al. April 21, 2 | 2009-04-21 |
| Lithographic projection apparatus and device manufacturing method Grant 7,274,431 - Box , et al. September 25, 2 | 2007-09-25 |
| Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method utilizing movement of clean air to reduce contamination App 20070002297 - Luttikhuis; Bernardus Antonius Johannes ; et al. | 2007-01-04 |
| Lithographic apparatus and a device manufacturing method Grant 7,126,664 - Luttikhuis , et al. October 24, 2 | 2006-10-24 |
| Lithographic apparatus and a device manufacturing method App 20060007414 - Luttikhuis; Bernardus Antonius Johannes ; et al. | 2006-01-12 |
| Lithographic projection apparatus and device manufacturing method App 20050018157 - Box, Wilhelmus Josephus ; et al. | 2005-01-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 