Trademark applications and grants for Happe Spine, Llc. Happe Spine, Llc has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "INTEGRATE"
State Incorporated | MICHIGAN |
Entity Type | LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY |
Address | 220 Lyon St. NW, Suite 500 Grand Rapids, MICHIGAN UNITED STATES 49503 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE WITH VARIED COMPOSITION AND POROSITY, AND METHOD FOR FORMING SAME 20220080630 - 17/473385 FARRIS; Jeffery A. ;   et al. | 2022-03-17 |
POROUS COMPOSITE BIOMATERIALS AND RELATED METHODS 20220062004 - 17/519336 ROEDER; Ryan K. ;   et al. | 2022-03-03 |
POROUS COMPOSITE BIOMATERIALS AND RELATED METHODS 20210177620 - 17/180935 ROEDER; Ryan K. ;   et al. | 2021-06-17 |
IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICE WITH THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE BODY AND METHOD FOR FORMING THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITE BODY 20200289714 - 16/817470 SNELL; Douglas ;   et al. | 2020-09-17 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"INTEGRATE" 97360814 |
INTEGRATE 2022-04-13 |
"PRO-FUSE" 97259844 |
PRO-FUSE 2022-02-09 |
"H" 97251347 |
H 2022-02-03 |
"H" 97251352 |
H 2022-02-03 |
"HAPPE" 97251344 |
HAPPE 2022-02-03 |
SEC | 0001773651 | HAPPE Spine, LLC of MICHIGAN |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.