Hancock; Christopher P.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hancock; Christopher P..The latest application filed is for "apparatus for localised invasive skin treatment using electromagnetic radiation".
- Hancock; Christopher P. - Avon N/A GB
- Hancock; Christopher P. - Bristol GB
- Hancock; Christopher P - Roath GB
- Hancock, Christopher P. - Roath GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Surgical antenna Grant 9,050,115 - Hancock June 9, 2 | 2015-06-09 |
| Needle structure and method of performing needle biopsies Grant 8,958,887 - Hancock February 17, 2 | 2015-02-17 |
| Electrosurgical ablation apparatus and a method of ablating biological tissue Grant 8,500,726 - Hancock , et al. August 6, 2 | 2013-08-06 |
| Apparatus For Localised Invasive Skin Treatment Using Electromagnetic Radiation App 20120035688 - Hancock; Christopher P. | 2012-02-09 |
| Tissue Measurement And Ablation Antenna App 20100228244 - Hancock; Christopher P. ; et al. | 2010-09-09 |
| Tissue resurfacing Grant 6,723,091 - Goble , et al. April 20, 2 | 2004-04-20 |
| Tissue resurfacing App 20010034519 - Goble, Colin C. O. ; et al. | 2001-10-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 