Hamza; Brahim
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hamza; Brahim.The latest application filed is for "circuit for dispensing windshield washer fluid for a motor vehicle".
- Hamza; Brahim - Guilherand-granges N/A FR
- Hamza; Brahim - Guilerand-Granges FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Device comprising a non-return valve Grant 8,967,495 - Hamza , et al. March 3, 2 | 2015-03-03 |
| Circuit for dispensing windshield washer fluid for a motor vehicle Grant 8,925,834 - Jeuffe , et al. January 6, 2 | 2015-01-06 |
| Windscreen wiper blade having a built-in washer liquid conduit Grant 8,898,849 - Jeuffe , et al. December 2, 2 | 2014-12-02 |
| Circuit For Dispensing Windshield Washer Fluid For A Motor Vehicle App 20130292488 - Jeuffe; Gerard ; et al. | 2013-11-07 |
| Device Comprising A Non-return Valve App 20130240569 - Hamza; Brahim ; et al. | 2013-09-19 |
| Windscreen Wiper Blade Having A Built-in Washer Liquid Conduit App 20120297564 - Jeuffe; Gerard ; et al. | 2012-11-29 |
| Windscreen Wiper Blade and Device for Wiping and Washing a Glazed Surface of a Motor Vehicle and Corresponding Wiping and Washing Method App 20120260939 - Jeuffe; Gerard ; et al. | 2012-10-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 