Hallady; Andreas
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hallady; Andreas.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for processing a specimen".
- Hallady; Andreas - Vienna AT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for processing a specimen Grant 8,113,099 - Lihl , et al. February 14, 2 | 2012-02-14 |
| Knife holder for microtome knives and microtome Grant 8,001,878 - Lang , et al. August 23, 2 | 2011-08-23 |
| High-pressure freezing device, automatic apparatus for loading specimens into a high-pressure freezing device, and method for loading a high-pressure freezing device Grant 7,621,145 - Plank , et al. November 24, 2 | 2009-11-24 |
| Apparatus for processing a specimen App 20080118312 - Lihl; Reinhard ; et al. | 2008-05-22 |
| High-pressure freezing device, automatic apparatus for loading specimens into a high-pressure freezing device, and method for loading a high-pressure freezing device App 20060090481 - Plank; Heinz ; et al. | 2006-05-04 |
| Knife holder for microtome knives and microtome App 20050072285 - Lang, Anton ; et al. | 2005-04-07 |
| Ergonomic Apparatus For Cutting Specimens App 20040251434 - Zimmermann, Michael ; et al. | 2004-12-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 