Haggenmueller; Reto
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Haggenmueller; Reto.The latest application filed is for "polymer-nanotube composites, fibers, and processes".
- Haggenmueller; Reto - Philadelphia PA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Dispersion method Grant 7,759,413 - Winey , et al. July 20, 2 | 2010-07-20 |
| Polymer-nanotube composites, fibers, and processes Grant 7,285,591 - Winey , et al. October 23, 2 | 2007-10-23 |
| Polymer-nanotube Composites, Fibers, And Processes App 20070213450 - Winey; Karen Irene ; et al. | 2007-09-13 |
| Flame retardant nanocomposite Grant 7,265,175 - Winey , et al. September 4, 2 | 2007-09-04 |
| Interfacial polymer incorporation of nanotubes Grant 7,148,269 - Winey , et al. December 12, 2 | 2006-12-12 |
| Nanostructure composites App 20060155043 - Johnson; Alan T. ; et al. | 2006-07-13 |
| Dispersion method App 20060036018 - Winey; Karen I. ; et al. | 2006-02-16 |
| Flame retardant nanocomposite App 20060036016 - Winey; Karen I. ; et al. | 2006-02-16 |
| Interfacial polymer incorporation of nanotubes App 20030180526 - Winey, Karen I. ; et al. | 2003-09-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 