Haferl; Peter E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Haferl; Peter E..The latest application filed is for "raster distortion correction circuit".
- Haferl; Peter E. - Adliswil CH
- Haferl; Peter E. - Zurich CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Raster distortion correction circuit Grant 5,115,171 - Haferl May 19, 1 | 1992-05-19 |
| Gullwing distortion corrected deflection circuitry for a square-planar picture tube Grant 4,682,085 - Haferl , et al. July 21, 1 | 1987-07-21 |
| Variable picture size circuit for a television receiver Grant 4,547,708 - Haferl October 15, 1 | 1985-10-15 |
| Television receiver standby circuit Grant 4,532,457 - Haferl July 30, 1 | 1985-07-30 |
| Linearity corrected horizontal deflection circuit Grant 4,516,058 - Haferl May 7, 1 | 1985-05-07 |
| Horizontal drive and nonlinearity correction circuit Grant 4,468,593 - Haferl August 28, 1 | 1984-08-28 |
| Variable horizontal deflection circuit capable of providing east-west pincushion correction Grant 4,429,257 - Haferl January 31, 1 | 1984-01-31 |
| Current switching networks Grant 4,177,392 - Haferl December 4, 1 | 1979-12-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 