loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hackler; Ronald E..The latest application filed is for "n-(4-pyridyl) (substituted phenyl) acetamide pesticides".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
N-(4-pyridyl) (substituted phenyl) acetamide pesticides Grant 5,597,836 - Hackler , et al. January 28, 1 | 1997-01-28 |
Pteridine derivatives Grant 5,350,749 - Hackler , et al. September 27, 1 | 1994-09-27 |
Quinoline nematicidal method Grant 5,227,387 - Dreikorn , et al. July 13, 1 | 1993-07-13 |
Furopyrimidin-4-imine derivatives Grant 5,137,879 - Edie , et al. August 11, 1 | 1992-08-11 |
Fungicidal use of pyridopyrimidine, pteridine, pyrimidopyrimidine, pyrimidopyridazine, and pyrimido-1,2,4-triazine derivatives Grant 5,034,393 - Hackler , et al. July 23, 1 | 1991-07-23 |
Xanthine oxidase inhibiting 3(5)-phenyl-substituted-5(3)-pyrazole-carboxylic acid derivatives, compositions, and methods of use Grant 4,495,195 - Beck , et al. January 22, 1 | 1985-01-22 |
3-Aryl-5-isothiazolecarboxylic acids and related compounds used to lower uric acid levels Grant 4,346,094 - Beck , et al. August 24, 1 | 1982-08-24 |
Synthesis of 5-pyrimidinecarbinols Grant 3,869,456 - Taylor , et al. March 4, 1 | 1975-03-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.