loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Hach; Clifford C..The latest application filed is for "programmable chemical application system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Programmable chemical application system Grant 4,993,634 - Hach , et al. * February 19, 1 | 1991-02-19 |
Programmable fertilizer application system Grant 4,878,614 - Hach , et al. November 7, 1 | 1989-11-07 |
System and method for quantitative analysis of a solution Grant 4,865,992 - Hach , et al. September 12, 1 | 1989-09-12 |
Continuous pH meter Grant 4,288,308 - Hach September 8, 1 | 1981-09-08 |
Mechanical strainer Grant 4,177,148 - Hach , et al. December 4, 1 | 1979-12-04 |
Digital titration device Grant 4,086,062 - Hach April 25, 1 | 1978-04-25 |
Method and apparatus for sampling impure water Grant 4,053,282 - Hach , et al. October 11, 1 | 1977-10-11 |
Method and apparatus for automatically analyzing fluids Grant 3,953,136 - Hach April 27, 1 | 1976-04-27 |
Disposable weight burette and method for carrying out titrimetric analyses Grant 3,905,768 - Hach September 16, 1 | 1975-09-16 |
Method And Apparatus For Eliminating Air During Fluid Turbidity Measurement Grant 3,849,002 - Hach November 19, 1 | 1974-11-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.