Gutkin; Igal
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gutkin; Igal.The latest application filed is for "utilizing persistent interference information for radio channel selection".
- Gutkin; Igal - Redwood City CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Application quality of experience metric Grant 10,602,388 - Rengarajan , et al. | 2020-03-24 |
| Correlating multiple detections of wireless devices without a unique identifier Grant 8,369,305 - Diener , et al. February 5, 2 | 2013-02-05 |
| Utilizing persistent interference information for radio channel selection Grant 8,305,971 - Gutkin , et al. November 6, 2 | 2012-11-06 |
| Utilizing Persistent Interference Information For Radio Channel Selection App 20100177710 - GUTKIN; Igal ; et al. | 2010-07-15 |
| Correlating Multiple Detections of Wireless Devices Without a Unique Identifier App 20090327333 - Diener; Neil R. ; et al. | 2009-12-31 |
| Measurement of air quality in wireless networks Grant 7,596,461 - Hart , et al. September 29, 2 | 2009-09-29 |
| Measurement of Air Quality in Wireless Networks App 20090012738 - Hart; Brian Donald ; et al. | 2009-01-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 