Trademark applications and grants for Gutierrez Johnny. Gutierrez Johnny has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SANDAHOLIC"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
ELISA FOR VEGF 20170276683 - 15/456846 MENG; Yu-Ju G. ;   et al. | 2017-09-28 |
ELISA FOR VEGF 20160033517 - 14/814139 MENG; Yu-Ju G. ;   et al. | 2016-02-04 |
ELISA FOR VEGF 20130045495 - 13/660563 MENG; Yu-Ju G. ;   et al. | 2013-02-21 |
ELISA FOR VEGF 20100255515 - 12/817827 Meng; Yu-Ju G. ;   et al. | 2010-10-07 |
ELISA for VEGF 20080227119 - 11/866560 Meng; Yu-Ju G. ;   et al. | 2008-09-18 |
Elisa for VEGF 9,625,462 - 14/814,139 Meng , et al. April 18, 2 | 2017-04-18 |
ELISA for VEGF 9,146,245 - 13/660,563 Meng , et al. September 29, 2 | 2015-09-29 |
ELISA for VEGF 9,146,245 - 13/660,563 Meng , et al. September 29, 2 | 2015-09-29 |
Anti-VEGF antibodies 8,449,885 - 12/817,827 Meng , et al. May 28, 2 | 2013-05-28 |
Anti-VEGF antibodies 8,449,885 - 12/817,827 Meng , et al. May 28, 2 | 2013-05-28 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "SANDAHOLIC" 78573837 |
SANDAHOLIC 2005-02-23 |
![]() "STUNT COCK" 78415488 |
STUNT COCK 2004-05-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.