loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Grulick; Matthew J..The latest application filed is for "peelable buffer layer having a preferential tear portion and methods of manufacturing the same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Peelable buffer layer having a preferential tear portion and methods of manufacturing the same Grant 6,957,000 - McAlpine , et al. October 18, 2 | 2005-10-18 |
Peelable buffer layer having a preferential tear portion and methods of manufacturing the same App 20040086242 - McAlpine, Warren W. ;   et al. | 2004-05-06 |
Fiber optic cable marking process and a sensor device for use therewith Grant 6,560,390 - Grulick , et al. May 6, 2 | 2003-05-06 |
Fiber optic cable marking process and a sensor device for use therewith App 20020009282 - Grulick, Matthew J. ;   et al. | 2002-01-24 |
Fiber optic cable marking process and a sensor device use therewith Grant 6,293,081 - Grulick , et al. September 25, 2 | 2001-09-25 |
Fiber optic cable reversal point marking process and a marking device for use therewith Grant 5,904,037 - Grulick , et al. May 18, 1 | 1999-05-18 |
Method of marking optical fiber lay direction reversal points on cable jackets Grant 5,729,966 - Grulick March 24, 1 | 1998-03-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.