loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for GRANADO; Guillermo Moreno.The latest application filed is for "5 & 6 ghz wi-fi coexistence acoustic wave resonator rf diplexer circuit".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
5 & 6 GHz Wi-Fi COEXISTENCE ACOUSTIC WAVE RESONATOR RF DIPLEXER CIRCUIT App 20220231665 - GRANADO; Guillermo Moreno ;   et al. | 2022-07-21 |
5.1-7.1GHz Wi-Fi6E COEXISTENCE ACOUSTIC WAVE RESONATOR RF DIPLEXER CIRCUIT App 20220231666 - GUPTA; Saurabh ;   et al. | 2022-07-21 |
Rf Baw Resonator Filter Architecture For 6.5ghz Wi-fi 6e Coexistence And Other Ultra-wideband Applications App 20220052665 - GRANADO; Guillermo Moreno ;   et al. | 2022-02-17 |
Removable sacrificial connections for semiconductor devices Grant 10,217,677 - Volatier , et al. Feb | 2019-02-26 |
Removable Sacrificial Connections For Semiconductor Devices App 20180240719 - Volatier; Alexandre Christian ;   et al. | 2018-08-23 |
Removable sacrificial connections for semiconductor devices Grant 10,037,925 - Volatier , et al. July 31, 2 | 2018-07-31 |
Removable Sacrificial Connections For Semiconductor Devices App 20170256467 - Volatier; Alexandre Christian ;   et al. | 2017-09-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.