Graf; Nicholas Robert
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Graf; Nicholas Robert.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for detecting malicious software transmission through a web portal".
- Graf; Nicholas Robert - Culver City CA US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for detecting malicious software transmission through a web portal Grant 9,350,755 - Glick , et al. May 24, 2 | 2016-05-24 |
| Behavior based signatures Grant 8,701,192 - Glick , et al. April 15, 2 | 2014-04-15 |
| Method and apparatus for detecting potentially misleading visual representation objects to secure a computer Grant 8,566,950 - Smith , et al. October 22, 2 | 2013-10-22 |
| Method and apparatus for securing a computer from malicious threats through generic remediation Grant 8,549,626 - Glick , et al. October 1, 2 | 2013-10-01 |
| Automatic detection of hardware and device drivers during restore operations Grant 8,132,186 - Okcu , et al. March 6, 2 | 2012-03-06 |
| Using a monitoring process to update system configuration settings during restore operations Grant 7,769,990 - Okcu , et al. August 3, 2 | 2010-08-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 