Gradle; Charles D.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gradle; Charles D..The latest application filed is for "hoof bath system".
- Gradle; Charles D. - Oak Park IL
- Gradle; Charles D. - Berwyn IL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hoof bath system Grant 8,925,493 - Torgerson , et al. January 6, 2 | 2015-01-06 |
| Hoof Bath System App 20120192805 - Torgerson; Kevin L. ; et al. | 2012-08-02 |
| Fatty acid antimicrobial Grant 8,043,626 - Dee , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
| Hoof bath system App 20100218731 - Torgerson; Kevin L. ; et al. | 2010-09-02 |
| Hoof bath system Grant 7,661,393 - Torgerson , et al. February 16, 2 | 2010-02-16 |
| Hoof Bath System App 20090283053 - Torgerson; Kevin L. ; et al. | 2009-11-19 |
| Peracetic teat dip App 20070249712 - Dee; Alejandro O. ; et al. | 2007-10-25 |
| Hoof bath system App 20070074672 - Torgerson; Kevin L. ; et al. | 2007-04-05 |
| Iodine-propylene glycol teat dip Grant 7,153,527 - Gradle , et al. December 26, 2 | 2006-12-26 |
| Iodine-propylene glycol teat dip App 20050233006 - Gradle, Charles D. ; et al. | 2005-10-20 |
| Iodine-propylene glycol teat dip Grant 6,902,747 - Gradle , et al. June 7, 2 | 2005-06-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 