loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Grabover; Edward A..The latest application filed is for "flexible ureteropyeloscope".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Flexible ureteropyeloscope Grant RE41,475 - Grabover , et al. August 3, 2 | 2010-08-03 |
Flexible ureteropyeloscope Grant 6,780,151 - Grabover , et al. August 24, 2 | 2004-08-24 |
Endoscope shaft with slotted tube Grant 6,749,560 - Konstorum , et al. June 15, 2 | 2004-06-15 |
Flexible ureteropyeloscope App 20030023142 - Grabover, Edward A. ;   et al. | 2003-01-30 |
Endoscope shaft with superelastic alloy spiral frame and braid Grant 6,485,411 - Konstorum , et al. November 26, 2 | 2002-11-26 |
Superelastic control wire sheath for flexible endoscope Grant 5,938,588 - Grabover , et al. August 17, 1 | 1999-08-17 |
Endoscope with semi-rigid shaft and malleable tip and method of manufacture Grant 5,876,330 - Grabover , et al. March 2, 1 | 1999-03-02 |
Endoscope with interlocking articulating deflection system Grant 5,857,964 - Konstorum , et al. January 12, 1 | 1999-01-12 |
Resectoscope with curved electrode channel and resiliently deflectable electrode section Grant 5,857,962 - Bracci , et al. January 12, 1 | 1999-01-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.