Goth; Mark
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Goth; Mark.The latest application filed is for "residential awning canopy assembly".
- Goth; Mark - Loveland CO
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Residential Awning Canopy Assembly App 20210164231 - Thompson; Scott Patrick ; et al. | 2021-06-03 |
| Residential awning canopy assembly Grant 10,947,736 - Thompson , et al. March 16, 2 | 2021-03-16 |
| Residential Awning Canopy Assembly App 20190301166 - THOMPSON; SCOTT PATRICK ; et al. | 2019-10-03 |
| Residential awning canopy assembly Grant 10,316,522 - Thompson , et al. | 2019-06-11 |
| Residential Awning Canopy Assembly App 20190010707 - Thompson; Scott Patrick ; et al. | 2019-01-10 |
| Residential Awning Canopy Assembly App 20170275884 - Thompson; Scott Patrick ; et al. | 2017-09-28 |
| Awning control with multidimensional motion sensing Grant 8,887,785 - Goth November 18, 2 | 2014-11-18 |
| Awning control with multidimensional motion sensing App 20110048651 - Goth; Mark | 2011-03-03 |
| Apparatus and method for retracting awning Grant 7,242,162 - Goth July 10, 2 | 2007-07-10 |
| Apparatus and method for retracting awning App 20060113936 - Goth; Mark | 2006-06-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 