GORILLA TECHNOLOGY INC.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Gorilla Technology Inc.. Gorilla Technology Inc. has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "IVAR"
- Company Aliases
- GORILLA TECHNOLOGY INC.
- GORILLA TECHNOLOGY INC. - Taipei City TW
| State Incorporated | TAIWAN |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | Neihu District 7-1F, No. 302, Ruey Kuang Rd. Taipei City TAIWAN |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and System of Evaluating the Valid Analysis Region of a Specific Scene 20210142481 - 16/732344 NI; SZE-YAO ; et al. | 2021-05-13 |
| Distributed Object Tracking System 20190340767 - 16/401115 Koh; Sih-Ping ; et al. | 2019-11-07 |
| Distributed Image Analysis System 20190253741 - 16/258676 KOH; SIH-PING ; et al. | 2019-08-15 |
| System and Method of Image Analyses 20190188042 - 16/167558 KOH; SIH-PING ; et al. | 2019-06-20 |
| Method of Evaluating the Quality of Images 20190114760 - 15/880558 NI; SZE-YAO ; et al. | 2019-04-18 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"IVAR" 5849373 88241754 |
IVAR 2018-12-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 