loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gordon; Terry.The latest application filed is for "photographic firearm apparatus and method".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Photographic firearm apparatus and method Grant 6,792,206 - Gordon September 14, 2 | 2004-09-14 |
Two part epoxide adhesive with improved strength Grant 6,645,341 - Gordon November 11, 2 | 2003-11-11 |
Photographic Firearm Apparatus And Method App 20030180038 - Gordon, Terry | 2003-09-25 |
Photographic firearm apparatus and method Grant 6,580,876 - Gordon June 17, 2 | 2003-06-17 |
Photographic firearm apparatus and method Grant 6,363,223 - Gordon March 26, 2 | 2002-03-26 |
Photographic rifle scope apparatus and method Grant 6,000,163 - Gordon December 14, 1 | 1999-12-14 |
NCAGE Code | 4FFM6 | GORDON TERRY |
NCAGE Code | 858W6 | GORDON, TERRY!DBA GT APPRAISAL |
CAGE Code | 4F9T0 | GORDON, TERRY TERRY GORDON |
CAGE Code | 4FFM6 | GORDON TERRY |
CAGE Code | 858W6 | GORDON, TERRY GT APPRAISAL |
S.A.M. Registration | 4F9T0 [780093931] | GORDON, TERRY |
S.A.M. Registration | 858W6 [790827302] | GORDON, TERRY GT APPRAISAL |
DUNS | 780093931 | Gordon, Terry |
DUNS | 790827302 | Gordon, Terry |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.