loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gopp; Alexander Y..The latest application filed is for "fueling control system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Fueling control system Grant 6,567,738 - Gopp , et al. May 20, 2 | 2003-05-20 |
Fueling control system App 20020184876 - Gopp, Alexander Y. ;   et al. | 2002-12-12 |
Method and apparatus for monitoring EGR system flow Grant 5,727,533 - Bidner , et al. March 17, 1 | 1998-03-17 |
Method and apparatus for protecting an engine from overheating Grant 5,555,871 - Gopp , et al. September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
Catalytic converter efficiency monitoring Grant 5,319,921 - Gopp June 14, 1 | 1994-06-14 |
Catalytic converter monitoring using downstream oxygen sensor Grant 5,159,810 - Grutter , et al. November 3, 1 | 1992-11-03 |
Catalytic converter efficiency monitoring Grant 5,157,919 - Gopp October 27, 1 | 1992-10-27 |
Dual EGO sensor closed loop fuel control Grant 5,115,639 - Gopp May 26, 1 | 1992-05-26 |
System and method for combined knock and torque timing control Grant 4,971,007 - Gopp , et al. November 20, 1 | 1990-11-20 |
Learning system for ignition control Grant 4,936,276 - Gopp June 26, 1 | 1990-06-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.