Trademark applications and grants for Golden Nancy. Golden Nancy has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "THE DOG HOUSE"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
CONSUMER TEXTILE SOFT GOODS PRODUCT FOR RETAIL SALE INCORPORATING VACUUM-SEALABLE BAG REUSABLE BY CONSUMERS 20110293205 - 13/113417 Piazza; John A. ;   et al. | 2011-12-01 |
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TEXTILE SOFT GOODS RETAIL PACKAGING INCORPORATING VACUUM-SEALABLE BAGS REUSABLE BY CONSUMERS 20110094935 - 12/983268 PIAZZA; John A. ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TEXTILE SOFT GOODS RETAIL PACKAGING INCORPORATING VACUUM-SEALABLE BAGS REUSABLE BY CONSUMERS 20110094933 - 12/983278 PIAZZA; John A. ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TEXTILE SOFT GOODS RETAIL PACKAGING INCORPORATING VACUUM-SEALABLE BAGS REUSABLE BY CONSUMERS 20110094932 - 12/983275 PIAZZA; John A. ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY TEXTILE SOFT GOODS RETAIL PACKAGING INCORPORATING VACUUM-SEALABLE BAGS REUSABLE BY CONSUMERS 20110094931 - 12/983273 PIAZZA; John A. ;   et al. | 2011-04-28 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "THE DOG HOUSE" 78525889 |
THE DOG HOUSE 2004-12-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.