loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gogos; Costas G..The latest application filed is for "devices, systems, and processes for processing polymers".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Devices, systems, and processes for processing polymers Grant 11,383,416 - Veariel , et al. July 12, 2 | 2022-07-12 |
Devices, systems, and processes for processing polymers Grant 11,325,294 - Veariel , et al. May 10, 2 | 2022-05-10 |
Advanced muzzle loader ammunition Grant 10,254,092 - Worrell, Jr. , et al. | 2019-04-09 |
Advanced muzzle loader ammunition Grant 9,377,277 - Worrell, Jr. , et al. June 28, 2 | 2016-06-28 |
Muzzle loader powder increment using celluloid combustible container Grant 8,881,634 - Worrell, Jr. , et al. November 11, 2 | 2014-11-11 |
Foamed celluloid process using expandable beads Grant 8,696,838 - Faridi , et al. April 15, 2 | 2014-04-15 |
Foamed celluloid mortar propellant increment containers Grant 08617328 - | 2013-12-31 |
Foamed celluloid mortar propellant increment containers Grant 8,617,328 - Young , et al. December 31, 2 | 2013-12-31 |
Foamed celluloid combustible material Grant 8,597,444 - Young , et al. December 3, 2 | 2013-12-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.