Godbout; Benoit
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Godbout; Benoit.The latest application filed is for "osteo-articular structure".
- Godbout; Benoit - Montreal CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Osteo-articular structure Grant 9,142,020 - DeGuise , et al. September 22, 2 | 2015-09-22 |
| Method for reconstruction of a three-dimensional model of a body structure Grant 8,660,329 - Skalli , et al. February 25, 2 | 2014-02-25 |
| Osteo-Articular Structure App 20100241405 - De Guise; Jacques A. ; et al. | 2010-09-23 |
| Method For Reconstruction Of A Three-dimensional Model Of A Body Structure App 20100174673 - Skalli; Wafa ; et al. | 2010-07-08 |
| Method of radiographic imaging for three-dimensional reconstruction, and a computer program and apparatus for implementing the method Grant 7,639,866 - Pomero , et al. December 29, 2 | 2009-12-29 |
| Evaluating disease progression using magnetic resonance imaging App 20050084145 - Pelletier, Jean Pierre ; et al. | 2005-04-21 |
| Evaluating disease progression using magnetic resonance imaging App 20050085709 - Pelletier, Jean Pierre ; et al. | 2005-04-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 