Gn Resound North America Corp
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Gn Resound North America Corp. Gn Resound North America Corp has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "PEDIHEAR"
- Company Aliases
- GN Resound North America Corp.
- GN RESOUND NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION
- GN RESOUND NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION - Redwood City CA
- GN RESOUND NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION - 220 Saginaw Drive Redwood City CA
- GN ReSound North America Corporation -
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| DYNAMIC RANGE COMPRESSION USING DIGITAL FREQUENCY WARPING 20080175422 - 11/866193 KATES; James M. | 2008-07-24 |
| Method of manufacturing hearing aid ear tube 20050190939 - 11/040763 Fretz, Robert J. | 2005-09-01 |
| Dynamic range compression using digital frequency warping 20030081804 - 10/008268 Kates, James M. | 2003-05-01 |
| Spectral enhancement using digital frequency warping 20030072464 - 10/087090 Kates, James M. | 2003-04-17 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"PEDIHEAR" 78215081 |
PEDIHEAR 2003-02-14 |
"AVANCE" 2588803 75574855 |
AVANCE 1998-10-22 |
"RESOURCE" 2098133 75009415 |
RESOURCE 1995-10-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 