Glenn, III; William K.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Glenn, III; William K..The latest application filed is for "height adjustment mechanism for an upright vacuum cleaner".
- Glenn, III; William K. - Anderson SC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Height adjustment mechanism for an upright vacuum cleaner Grant 5,499,425 - Glenn, III March 19, 1 | 1996-03-19 |
| Electrical implement with variable speed control Grant 5,455,886 - Glenn, III , et al. October 3, 1 | 1995-10-03 |
| Noise reduction system for hard body vacuum Grant 5,289,612 - Glenn, III March 1, 1 | 1994-03-01 |
| Quick connect rotary bearing for a vacuum cleaner Grant 5,279,018 - Glenn, III January 18, 1 | 1994-01-18 |
| Vacuum cleaner for on floor and off floor suction cleaning Grant 5,222,276 - Glenn, III June 29, 1 | 1993-06-29 |
| Upright soft bag type vacuum cleaner Grant 5,216,779 - Glenn, III June 8, 1 | 1993-06-08 |
| Floor care appliance Grant 4,512,057 - Laing , et al. April 23, 1 | 1985-04-23 |
| Carpet cleaning power head device Grant 4,457,042 - Jones , et al. July 3, 1 | 1984-07-03 |
| Power head unit for carpet cleaning Grant 4,447,930 - Glenn, III , et al. May 15, 1 | 1984-05-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 