loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Giles; Randy Clinton.The latest application filed is for "direct optical image projectors".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Direct optical image projectors Grant 7,440,158 - Giles , et al. October 21, 2 | 2008-10-21 |
Direct Optical Image Projectors App 20080212159 - Giles; Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2008-09-04 |
Multiple access free space laser communication method and apparatus App 20080056723 - Giles; Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2008-03-06 |
System and method for optically labeled packet transmission Grant 7,340,168 - Giles , et al. March 4, 2 | 2008-03-04 |
System and method for WDM communication with interleaving of optical signals for efficient wavelength utilization Grant 7,283,753 - Giles , et al. October 16, 2 | 2007-10-16 |
Optical device with configurable channel allocation Grant 7,016,098 - Giles , et al. March 21, 2 | 2006-03-21 |
System and method for optically labeled packet transmission App 20050069329 - Giles, Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2005-03-31 |
Optical cross connect employing a curved optical component Grant 6,836,381 - Giles , et al. December 28, 2 | 2004-12-28 |
System and method for WDM communication with interleaving of optical signals for efficient wavelength utilization App 20040218922 - Giles, Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2004-11-04 |
Method and device for optically crossconnecting optical signals using tilting mirror MEMS with drift monitoring feature Grant 6,798,992 - Bishop , et al. September 28, 2 | 2004-09-28 |
Optical device with configurable channel allocation App 20040130774 - Giles, Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2004-07-08 |
Optical cross connect employing a curved optical component App 20040085656 - Giles, Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2004-05-06 |
Optical MEMS switch with imaging system Grant 6,704,476 - Ford , et al. March 9, 2 | 2004-03-09 |
Optical crossconnect using tilting mirror MEMS array Grant 6,690,885 - Aksyuk , et al. February 10, 2 | 2004-02-10 |
Imaging technique for use with optical MEMS devices Grant 6,647,172 - Giles , et al. November 11, 2 | 2003-11-11 |
Channelized wavelength division multiplex equalizer using reflective attenuators Grant 6,636,657 - Aksyuk , et al. October 21, 2 | 2003-10-21 |
Wavelength division add/drop multiplexer Grant 6,519,059 - Doerr , et al. February 11, 2 | 2003-02-11 |
Imaging technique for use with optical MEMS devices App 20030002782 - Giles, Randy Clinton ;   et al. | 2003-01-02 |
Optical MEMS switch with imaging system App 20030002781 - Ford, Joseph Earl ;   et al. | 2003-01-02 |
MEMS optical isolators Grant 6,441,360 - Bishop , et al. August 27, 2 | 2002-08-27 |
System and method for training an optical cross-connect comprising steerable switching elements Grant 6,411,751 - Giles , et al. June 25, 2 | 2002-06-25 |
Mems variable optical delay lines Grant 6,356,377 - Bishop , et al. March 12, 2 | 2002-03-12 |
Magnetically tunable optical attenuator and method of attenuating signals Grant 6,301,425 - Espindola , et al. October 9, 2 | 2001-10-09 |
Micro-electro-mechanical optical device Grant 6,300,619 - Aksyuk , et al. October 9, 2 | 2001-10-09 |
Optical signal monitor for multiwave optical signals Grant 6,104,492 - Giles , et al. August 15, 2 | 2000-08-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.