loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Giffen; Jonathan C..The latest application filed is for "cartridge-based computing system".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Computing device remote control system Grant 11,422,602 - Giffen , et al. August 23, 2 | 2022-08-23 |
Interactive user control of power utilization Grant 11,316,343 - Giffen , et al. April 26, 2 | 2022-04-26 |
Support for common motherboard configuration for USB retiming Grant 11,308,022 - Giffen April 19, 2 | 2022-04-19 |
Cartridge-based Computing System App 20210410308 - Hobbs; Derric Christopher ;   et al. | 2021-12-30 |
Computing Device Remote Control System App 20210397237 - Giffen; Jonathan C. ;   et al. | 2021-12-23 |
Interactive User Control Of Power Utilization App 20210391716 - Giffen; Jonathan C. ;   et al. | 2021-12-16 |
Support For Common Motherboard Configuration For Usb Retiming App 20210374088 - Giffen; Jonathan C. | 2021-12-02 |
USB recepticle configuration and system therefor Grant 11,093,426 - Giffen August 17, 2 | 2021-08-17 |
Memory interconnect arrangement having high data transfer speed signal integrity Grant 9,155,194 - Sullivan , et al. October 6, 2 | 2015-10-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.